Hey, what's up guys? Sean Paul Ray with Long Island Audit here. Back again with another video coming to you live from an undisclosed location here in our great country. So, by now most of us, if not all of us, have seen the entirety of the trial in the state of Corrupt. I would love to know your guys' thoughts. That's why I wanted to come live. But since then, since the trial in its entirety has been uploaded to the channel, the court has reached out to me. So, the court has reached out and they told me the number one question I get from everybody is when is the judge going to decide whether you're guilty or not guilty? We all know I'm not guilty, but we'll talk about that at the end of the video. But that's the number one question I've been getting from across social media. I didn't know when the trial ended. He said two to three weeks. Uh, but today I do know when that date is, and that date is going to be September 3rd. So, mark your calendars. September 3rd is when Judge Cody Guinari is going to be issuing his decision in this case. You know, personally, I don't think he needed that much time to come to a decision. But who am I to question him, right? I'm just some lowly citizen here and he's the judge in this case. And again, I'll talk to you about my thoughts about the judge later on in this video, but you know, I do have thoughts about him and I'm not going to sugarcoat my thoughts about anyone. Um, even though they do have my freedom in their hands, this charge does carry up to 90 days in the correctional facility in Connecticut. So, there is a possibility of up to 90 days of jail time. You know, it is what it is. Um, I know I'm innocent. We all know I'm innocent. We've seen the videos. But people have been asking me, Sean, can you just cut out a certain spot of the trial? Do you want me to do clips? Because the both of the trial videos are over, I believe, 4 hours long. So, not a lot of people like to watch that. So to get into the mind of what exactly Judge Guinari is going to be thinking about over the next couple weeks at this point um and will be deciding on September 3rd, which September 3rd for those of you I know I'm going to get this question. September 3rd will be recorded. The media has put in a request to record. So they there you go there. It will be recorded and it will be broadcast on my channel. So make sure you subscribe, have notifications turned on so you don't miss it. Um, big shout out really quickly to the man behind the scenes and who edited the entirety of the four hours of the trial, Vinnie with Garden State Accountability. I really appreciate him. He has really helped me out. He's been great support uh throughout this trial. He showed up, he supported me. Scalo photo, Leroy Truth, and Leroy Truth Investigation. So much support from the people, even some of my supporters there in Danielson. So, Danielson Superior Court, September 3rd, the judge will make his decision. But and I want to tell you my thoughts on the judge and what I think he's ultimately going to do as well as conversations with my attorneys because I know you saw me representing myself proay but I had two attorneys on retainer to um advise me throughout it and help me write motions etc etc. So we'll talk about that at the end. I want to show you right now the closing of both the state's attorney fee apparently no rel no relation to Brian Fehee and my closing. So, let's roll let's run that right now and then at the end I'll tell you guys my thoughts. >> Judge, um, in looking to the um connected jury instructions, uh, your honor has to find that um, in order to find the defendant guilty that he entered or remained in premises that are posted in a manner described by law, reasonably likely to come to the attention of the intruders. The reality is, judge, that sign that was posted, uh, forget about the no trespassing sign. There's been a lot of talk about the no trespassing sign. Now, it is curious that the defendant would not have done further research uh including looking uh anywhere else on the property given how uh narrow that driveway was after seeing that sign. But that sign is enough. Quite frankly, judge, I don't think the sign is necessary. And the reason I say that is because just simply based on the animosity we've talked talked about that had previous existed before between Sergeant Fei and uh Mr. Reyes. No reasonable person in that situation would think that they were licensed or privileged to go there. When Mr. Reyes talks about an implied license judge, um, one, he started to site, and I'm sure he'll site again, a Florida case, which holds no, uh, has no power in the state of Connecticut. Um but the reality of the situation is uh because every state's laws are different. The reality of the situation is the animosity alone uh should have told him that he had no license or privilege to go that he would as as the jury instructions talk about. Um to be licensed or privilege must either have consent from the person in possession of the premises or have some other right to be on the land. uh simply calling yourself a journalist and and going to the door when there's a no trespassing sign and there is animosity such as this uh one uh would does not knowingly have any right to be on that property. When one talks about implied consent uh in the state's opinion what that would suggest is you can't order something from Amazon when the Amazon driver comes up have them arrested. You can't uh take uh public utility services such as water or gas or electric and when the meter reader comes up to your house claim they're trespassing. There's an implied consent with uh items such as that. There clearly is no implied consent. Uh I'm unaware of any uh implied consent uh cases in Connecticut that would suggest uh journalists have a uh an absolute right, especially when property is posted, to be able to enter that property despite the signage. That sign is very clear that it was a private road. Uh it is a driveway. It's flanked by two mailboxes. And Mr. branch chose to walk down past that sign, admitted that he saw the sign and effectively ignored that sign. He had no license and privilege, especially uh and and he has knowledge of that based on the animosity and the ongoing civil lawsuit that was pending with a deposition pending. To to suggest that he went there simply to ask about some other story is ludicrous. And I would ask your honor to find him guilty of criminal trespass in the third degree. All right, ladies and gentlemen. So, before we get to my closing and then his rebuttal at the end, his final closing, I just wanted to point out I think it is completely ridiculous that a state's attorney, John Fehee, not a state's attorney, not an assistant states attorney. He is the state's attorney. John Fehee is the state's attorney for that judicial district in Connecticut. So, the way Connecticut works, it's broken up into judicial districts. And in the judicial districts, each one has its own states attorney. John Fehee, he is one of them. So he typically handles murder trials, you know, very serious cases. But he took it upon himself, him and his assistant, two lawyers versus a non-awyer, to take up this case. And he talks about the posted sign. He talks about implied consent, but yet he has no idea about Florida v. Jardines, which he incorrectly points out that it is a Florida case. I mean, how are you a state's attorney prosecuting a a case about implied consent to conduct a knock and talk, but yet you have no idea when it comes to the Florida state, Florida v. Jardines, which is a Supreme Court binding case on the entire country, not just Connecticut, where it talks about the implied consent of police officers, citizens to knock and talk, conduct a knock and talk, a brief knock and talk and a private road sign, which he now says private driveway. Is it a private driveway or is there a private road? He's talking out of both sides of his mouth. He refuse to refers to it as a no trespassing sign. you know it. He knows in his heart, in his brain, he knows that that sign doesn't apply. But he's trying to get a conviction because why? Because the police unions, the Connecticut State Police Department, the town of Graten, all of law enforcement in Connecticut is looking at this case and they hate that I would dare knock on their door. And you know, this is I'll talk about the judge is what I think the judge is going to be mulling over in this case in a little bit, but let's let's hear the rest of my closing and then his closing. Let's take a look. Judge, curious to me that state attorney fe now says I should have known because of animosity. You didn't hear any testimony that there was animosity. You heard testimony that I didn't approve of his actions on those days. I don't have animosity towards anyone. States Attorney Fe to tell you that the implied license and obviously he has no idea what he's talking about. implied license for Amazon driver delivery driver utility worker and he says that I cited a Florida case Florida Jardines is a Supreme Court case judge it's not a Florida case it is binding on this court it is a Supreme Court case that acknowledges that the police and the public in general me being a independent journalist or whatever states attorney fa thinks I am that doesn't give me some special privilege The general public has a has a privilege just like Girl Scouts, solar panel salesmen, uh, Jehovah's Witnesses, the general public has a license or privilege to do a knocking talk. And in some circuits, the 10th circuit, I'm going to hand you your memorandum of law um when I finish. They have said that for signs don't negate, and obviously that's persuasive binding on the court, but they have said that um signs don't negate your implied license or privilege to knock on to conduct a knocking. State Attorney Fe wants to make this case now about this animosity. That is a pure fiction in his own mind. He's provided no evidence of animosity. He didn't question Mr. about any animosity. There's there's nothing in the record that indicates that I had any animosity towards Sergeant But I would argue even if I did, it wouldn't revoke my implied license or privilege to knock on the door to conduct a knock control. That's what he's saying. His case is so put together the no trespassing sign. Put it to the side, judge. Put the other side to the side because the animosity. Well, the statue requires a sign be posted uh reasonably likely to come to the attention of an intruder. I wasn't an intruder. I was a visitor. was conducting a knock control. Just judge. This court has narrowed this case in two questions. Whether the premises were posted in a manner reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders and whether I knew I was l not licensed or privileged to be there. The state must prove both beyond a reasonable doubt. On this record, it has proven neither. Officer is the man who testified that he found the sign, the no trespassing sign. He told this court it was in the brush approximately 10 ft off the edge of the driveway. Now, state attorney say he would have I'm sure he would love for me to have gone 10 ft into the bushes and rumage around in the trees to try and find something and that didn't happen because no reasonable person would do that. They would look, you saw the video and then it's evidence. The video the cameraman was in front of me. You see me motion him to come in front of me specifically, judge, so that way the camera can see. Unfortunately, yes, I've been arrested many times. I believe 13 times in the last 5 years, judge. Not one criminal conviction. That speaks volumes to the government. Governments that have done it, not me. Officer Mansky told me he walked down the driveway at least two times up and down the driveway before he found the sign and he only located it after Mrs. Fagy told them where it was, where to look. Consider what that means. A trained officer standing on that property looking for signs walked past it twice and he needed the homeowner's wife to point him to it. test. Ryan Fatty testified. He couldn't recall when's the last time he saw the sign posted. Mrs. Fatty said she didn't know either. She testified to that. But yet, he's 90% positive. That doesn't add up. It just doesn't add up. Can't be 90% positive. Then you have no idea when it was last posted. He obviously was trying. His purpose in sitting in that chair was to try and and and defame me and and discredit me to this court. Not the truth. Officer McKennney testified. She walked the same driveway. She testified she never saw the sign. So I hit the guard, the leading investigative supervisor. He says he saw the sign, but never told anybody about it. Never told me. Never told. It's nowhere to be found. Brian By's testimony that he was 90% positive, but he doesn't know when's the last time he saw the sign. Those two answers cannot be in the same testimony. Judge, he's 90% certain of the fact. He can't place the time. 90% sure of something. He 100% doesn't know. That is not recollection. That is a man telling the court what he needs to hear. Mr. Glover, my cameraman, walked the driveway beside me. He testified he never saw private property no trespassing sign. Judge. I testified I never saw the sign. Not because I wasn't looking, but because it wasn't able to be seen. Judge, one more thing on this element. Judge, and there is one thing I would ask this court to weigh most heavily. The state has not shown this court a single photograph, not one photograph of where the no trespassing sign actually laid that day. Not one. The only photograph in this case was taken after officer Robotsky pulled that sign out of the brush and moved it to the side of the driveway, which he says he don't know. He doesn't know why he did. That's what he testified to this court. The state's evidence of posting posting is a photograph of the sign in a place it was not. So now the state has moved. It's no longer really arguing the trespassing sign because it cannot. It's now asking for depicting on the strength of yellow vehicle signs along the driveway that said private road dead end. No turn around. It didn't say do not enter. Didn't say not welcome here. And in fact, I would submit to this court, the fact that there's an existence of a no trespassing sign and this sign would indicate that it was needed to have a no trespassing sign in addition to this sign to make it clear to anyone who was going to knock on the property, knock on the door, and conduct a knocking talk that they weren't welcome. I testified to what I understood those words to mean on July 11, 2025. And I understand the same way I'm standing here today, George. Private road, meaning the roadway is privately owned and maintained rather than a public street. Dead end, meaning the road does not go through. No turn around, meaning the road is not wide enough to turn a vehicle around. So do not try. Didn't bring my vehicle down there that day, judge, because that's what I understood the sign to mean. There are traffic signs. Every word of them is addressed to a vehicle and how that road is used. Not one of it, not one word of it says a visitor is not welcome. Not one word of it says don't knock. Not one word provokes any permission to walk up to the front door. Judge, here is how we know that they themselves never believe those signs did work because they had the condition of the no trespassing sign. The private road signs, they're on the left side of the driveway. judge. The second sign Brian Fay testified to was on the property of his neighbor. Those signs could have been for his neighbor. I had no idea in the moment he purchased his neighbor purchased the signs. His neighbor installed the signs. One of the two signs is on the neighbor's property. It's not clear to anybody walking up that single driveway who those signs would apply to. It's not clear. You don't have to take my word that it was a visible approach, judge, because you watched it. You saw defendants exit today. You saw my approach to the front door. The private property, no trespassing sign does not appear anywhere in that footage. The state, as I said before, did not provide any photograph of that sign whatsoever. Before I get into the knowledge element judging, this whole prosecution was a farce. State's attorney fee charged me with criminal trespassing. I was originally charged by the Bron Police Department with the same docket for felony voyerism. Objection. >> It's what I was originally charged with. But this whole investigation was biased from the start. judge is so clear. It was so they were protecting police officers. Judge, >> the fact that I reduced charges to what I thought was the appropriate charge and what we're here for is all that matters. Judge here, the charges have been dismissed and so um is your >> It matters why they charged me with it in the first place. Judge, it shows the animosity by the police officers, not me. Show the bias in their investigation. Courts records and case substitute information. Thank you. The second question is whether I knew I was licensed or privileged to be there. I testified about my work. I'm a journalist. I investigate and I protest allegations of government misconduct. And that is why I was on that road on July 11th. I testified about the research I conducted to do that work about my practice which has not changed from one residence to the next. Every time I look for signage that would tell me my permission to approach has been revoked. If I see a no trespassing sign, I don't pass it, judge. In the last 15 years, I have not committed another crime. I've not committed any crimes. I I love my family. I do not want to go to jail. I want to expose bad cops. That is the mission. That's why I went there that day to try and expose and get information about bad cops. and you spit my face. This thing says the fact that I was looking for one proves I might be trespassing somehow. Judge approves the precise opposite. A man who attempts to trespass does not stop and read signage. He does not spend his walking his walk scanning the tree line. He looks because he intends to obey. And there was nothing there to obey Jake. I walked to the front door, I knocked. That is a knocking door. That is an implied license that every single person in this country holds. It is not a novel idea and it is not my invention. It belongs to the mail carrier, the delivery driver, the girl scout, the neighbor, the police officer who may wake up, walk up and knock precisely because that is no more than any private citizen may do. When Mr. took that he opened the door and told me to leave. I left that the actions of a trespasser or somebody who wants to trespass on property to somebody who immediately complies. You saw I did what the license permits that I do, nothing more. And judge, I did not learn that no trespassing signing existed that I testified to on anyone property until after my arrest when I reviewed the body camera footage produced to me in discovery. I could not have known July 11th when a trained officer had to be shown where to find it. A word about Mr. F B F B F B F B F B F B F B F B F B F B F testimony both V I guess um they're both testifying today. A a word about judge because this court has to decide what way cares. He did not come to this courtroom to help you define facts. He came with something else in mind. He showed you what it was without being asked in answers that were not responsive to the questions put to him. He told this court more than once, I have a felony conviction. He didn't say it was 15 years ago. That conviction 15 years ago predates my marriage, my children, my business. It has nothing whatever whatsoever to do with whether a sign was attached to a tree in 2025. He knew and he knew it when he said he volunteered way more than once. that tells this court nothing about the sign and tells you everything about why that man was on the standard and what why he said he was there on the stand. This is a man who spit in the face of a journalist, pulled a gun, said he was going to shoot me as I was retreating from his property. He wasn't scared. His own wife begged him not to go. Objection. Back. I ask the ask the court to disregard his testimony. He's not 90% about anything about signing. Judge, I want to talk about the two men who were all that long on July 11, 2025. and about what happened to each. One man walked up to a front door, knocked on it, and asked a question about $75,000 in overtime in a single objection. Went to ask about overtime. The young man went to his house. Went into his house, retrieved a load of firearm, came back out, walked down his driveway, and after a man was already retreating towards the road. Objection relevant as to criminal trespass in his face. That is not dispute. Never has been. He admitted it was in an estate. Judge, you heard in this court about how carefully the law was pared that day on his behalf. Nobody performed the analysis for me. Nobody on the property. Nobody on the property that afternoon opened up 53A 109 and asked whether a sign laying in a brush 10 ft off the driveway is a is a posted sign. They found a reason not to charge in that day judge and they found three charges for me. a handcuff transported process. >> Again, objection to this issue. We getting back to elements, the events. I've spent my career documenting injustice in this country. Judge, standing in courouses, holding a camera, recording what happens to people who do not who have no one to speak for them. I have never expected to be standing inside one of those injustices myself when I started my activism 5 years ago answering for a sign that three officers couldn't even find a judge and another sign that it doesn't indicate anything about revoking license privilege to be on the property. The same has failed. They it utterly failed to prove anything in this case. I I didn't know. They they can't prove. I knew I was cuz I didn't. They offered no testimony, no evidence as to I should have known other than their own madeup animosity that I don't even have. Judge, that's that's what the state is resting their head on. Animosity that they can't prove. Testimony from the state's attorney. Animosity. That's what they told you when they're closing. He should have known because of animosity that doesn't exist. Judge, this prosecution is another spit in my face. Judge difference is this time nobody last time nobody was standing dropping prime faith. today there is that's what this court is for that is the only reason any of us are in this room if you want to disregard everything I said because I admitted I made a bad decision 15 years ago judge that's your cur but just remember I testified since then I have worked closely with police departments across our country I have done ride alongs command staff meetings district attorneys have offered have have invited me and I've done trainings with district attorney's offices. I bring on law enforcement officers on my channel all the time is beyond the scope of the issues and some of it is not subject to testimony. So we get back to the like I said judge you don't take my word for it. I believe this is a country of redemption. I believe I believe myself. I paid my debt to society. But take their word for it. Take Mr. Fay, outstanding state attorney's word for it. Take the state's word for it. Take the law enforcement officer's word for it. Take the officer your officer down sign in the brush after walking past it twice. And only after being told where to look, that's when he found it. Another officer never saw it. Another sergeant said it wasn't clearly posted. The sergeant D'Angelo said it wasn't clearly posted. Their complaint can't even tell the court when the last time they laid eyes on the side. The state has not proven that these premises were posted in a manner reasonably likely to come to the attention of anyone walking up that driveway. It has not proven that I knew I wasn't licensed or privileged to knock on the door. Obviously, the state is not familiar with the Supreme Court case, but I will hand you uh I'll I'll educate you. Those are the elements of this offense. Both of them fail. And when the elements of a crime fail, judge, court of law has exactly one honest thing left to do. Find me not guilty. Thank you, Judge. Judge, um just a couple of points. Um I have been very clear from the very beginning with council that represented Mr. raised beforehand and and I've been very clear in this courtroom. It's that first sign that is all that is necessary under our statute for the notice requirement and reason why it comes to the attention. In fact, Mr. Ray himself testified he saw it. He ignored it. He walked by it because he believed it to be something else. But it said, and let's be clear, he keeps referring to a road. It was a driveway, not a road. It was private property. He was on, not a road, not even a private road. It was private property, a driveway that was posted private. They didn't manufacture. So, I just want to jump in really quick here because it's a driveway or it's a road because the sign said private road, right? Are we seeing things? The sign said private road, dead end, no turnaround. That's what it said. But he keeps on, States Attorney Fehee keeps on saying, "Well, it's really a driveway." Then why doesn't it say private driveway? It says private road, dead end, no turnaround. Clearly a vehicle sign. Clearly a sign meant for vehicles. We all know it. We're not stupid. And at the end of the day, he says that that's a sign, not the no trespassing sign in the bush. Judge, silly me. I thought this whole case was about the no trespassing sign. I had no idea this case was about the private road dead end no turnaround sign. But silly me, I thought that was just out of hand because that doesn't clearly indicate to any intruder, which the statute calls the person who's an intruder is not somebody knocking on the door. Um, and you need to give notice to this quote unquote intruder. And we'll talk about the animosity. I just wanted to jump in there because he keeps saying private road, private driveway, but then the sign right here there, that's the exact sign. It says road, doesn't say driveway. So, let's take a look at the rest of it and I'll get back with you guys at the end because I think you'll like I'm looking at the question. >> That's how the sign >> and I'm looking at the questions in the chat and I'm going to answer them at the end. >> Very clear uh from uh Miss Fagy and Mr. that the the whole point was to avoid trespassers in any way, shape, or form coming up their driveway and that's why that was posted. There's been a lot of talk about the no trespassing sign. I've never included with this council before indicated that's what I was relying on as being posted. It's just curious to me that Sergeant Madard was able to see that from the driveway walking up the first time um before it got moved by uh Officer Mansky and he could photograph it in place, but that he was able to see it from the driveway, but somehow Mr. Reyes and Mr. Glover weren't able to. Um however, that first sign alone is sufficient for notice under our statute. the animosity, the civil lawsuit, all the other uh that plays into the fact that he knows he was not welcome on that property. Should not have been on that property. He doesn't have a right to be on that privy posted and and there's no he knows there's no legitimate he wasn't invited by Mr. Becky to speak about anything. He went there of his own accord and in doing so he violated the law in the state of Connecticut. Um I remind the court that Mr. Batty that he now tells you to completely disregard was not even called by the state was called by Mr. Rees. Um for what purpose I don't know confrontation again in court which it resulted in ultimately um further bolstering the state's claim about animosity between the two individuals dating back to that first incident. I can assure the court of one thing. I think if Mr. say he was not the person who walked out of that door in 2021. There would never be a claim of uh a claim of uh overtime abuse by uh Sergeant because I can uh and and Mr. Reyes does a does an internet search. He >> So, of course, I got to jump in again. I'm watching right along with you guys. Of course, there wouldn't have been an investigation about overtime if former Sergeant Brian Fehee never came to the door and opened the door when he was receiving my complaint. Of course not. I would have never known who he was. I would have never known him to be a savage thug criminal with a badge. I would have never known who he was to investigate him in the first place. I'm glad that he walked out of that door because guess what? He should have just went back to work. And I know you're watching this, Fee. I bet you you wish and everybody you know wishes that you went back to work. That's what I told him, ladies and gentlemen. It all started because he was being you're gonna go right now, right? You're gonna go make your complaint right now. You're gonna go when I tell you to go because I'm Brian Fehee. I'm the sergeant of pistol permits which I was put here because to keep me away from the public because I'm so unhinged because I've stomped out people's faces on the street before. Stay tuned for that video. I'm going to try and get it. Working on it. The person's so scared of Brian Fehee. They don't want to give it to me. But it's coming, Brian. It's coming. So, the fact that he walked out of the door is a good thing because I got to investigate him and expose him for all of his criminal acts that he's done afterwards. And I'm still working on the story about the overtime. I'm just being stonewalled by the state of corruptate. They won't hand over any time sheets, documents, or surveillance footage. They just keep stonewalling me and I have to hire attorneys to pursue lawsuits against them to try and get a judge to tell them what it is. But again, they keep talking about this animosity. Animosity doesn't play into it at all. I don't have animosity towards anyone. Let me be clear. I don't. I'm professional. I am. But I don't have animosity towards Brian Fehee. I have disdain for his actions as I testified in trial. And I have disdain that the same system that is prosecuting me maliciously, I'm on trial because I'm not a cop. I don't have a badge. That's why I'm on trial. Brian Fehee never went to trial because for his multitude of crimes he committed because he's a cop. And I disdain that as a freedomloving American. And I think we all should disdain that because guess what? Whether you back the blue, you lick the boot, whatever it is. It could be you, could be your family members, it could be somebody that you love that is going through a situation where the police are ignoring the crime committed by the police officer, but they're trying to convict your loved one. It's a we see it happen all the time. So animosity does not revoke my license or privilege. The Supreme Court in uh Florida v Jardines doesn't say you know you have a license implied license or privilege to conduct a knock and talk but only if there's not animosity because you know what it was a cornerstone of that case. It involves citizens and the cops. That's like saying, and I wish I would have made this argument in in my closing, but 2020 vision, right? And we'll get to the if I regret not having a lawyer at the end of this video, but knocking on the door that Florida vart Jardian's case centered around police officers, right? So imagine the Suffach County Police Department with its leader, Lucilla, who unlawfully arrested me. I have, you could say, one could argue that there is animosity by the Suffach County Police Department towards me. They know a known animosity. I was unlawfully arrested. Um the handcuffs were put on. Then it cut a nerve in my pinched a nerve in my my wrist. So you make that argument now saying that if I have a private road sign, the police can't knock on my door. They don't have implied consent to knock on the door. Of course they do. Of course they do. It's such a disingenuous argument. That's what the judge and we'll talk about what I think the judge really needs to think about in this case. And I'm actually glad he took two to three weeks, you know, whatever it is, 3 weeks to look at the case because hopefully he looks at the case law. He looks at my memorandum of law that I filed at the end of this case. But I mean, it seems pretty simple to me. But let's get back to the video and let's finish it up and I'll go I'll come back at the end. Two could find uh dozens of troopers that probably made more than Mr. Fe. That's neither here nor there. What matters is on July 11th, did he pass a sign? Did he know the sign was there? Was it reasonably posted? It was. It was on the FA's property. It was on next to their driveway that they owned all the way up to the split in the road. And uh Kimberly actually believes a sign second sign to be on their property. But that's neither here. That that first sign is sufficient. He indicated he saw it. He walked by it and he had no license or privilege to be there and he knew that. I would ask your honor to find your guil judge. Uh he has no right to respond. I have to prove judge. No, I'm not trying. I understand. I try to offer. >> Oh, that's fine. Judge, I just wanted to offer this memorandum. All right. take the matter or take the memory. All right, fellow Patriots. So, we could take the video completely off the off the screen. There we go. So, I wanted to address some of the comments that I've seen because this is the first time we're speaking since the end of the trial. So, I wanted to address some stuff. So, I wrote it down. People are asking about my camera hand cameraman, excuse me. People ask about my cameraman, Teaheene Glover, the real hero. If it wasn't for him, if he wasn't there that day, I probably wouldn't wouldn't be with you guys. Um, but, you know, at the end of the day, it is what it is. When you're dealing with dangerous thugs with guns and badges, that's some, you know, that's always a possibility. So, my cameraman, who again did nothing wrong. He was just there to film. He just took a job. He's a 20-year-old, no criminal record, a really good kid. And, um, he he was able to I hired his entire legal defense. I bonded him out on his $50,000 bond and he was able to um enter in to a accelerated rehabilitation program, the same thing that Fehee did. And after 3 months, which we're coming on 3 months right now, I believe, uh the case is dismissed and expuned from his record. You know, some people might say, well, why didn't he take it to trial? Well, he didn't take it to trial because he's not Long Island Audit, right? He's he has nothing to prove to anybody. a dismissal is where it gets expuned from your record completely like it never happened is a win for him. Um, and he can still file a federal lawsuit. There's new case law out of the second circuit and out of the Supreme Court that touches on these kind of diversion deals. Um, but again, that's what happened to him. We talked about, let's see, the Okay, people wanted to know about do I regret not having an attorney with me. I don't regret not having an attorney with me. I don't regret it at all because I wanted to confront my accuser. The reason the state's attorney says, "Well, he called Mr. Fay. He has a witness." Well, I did because I wanted him to have to answer for something. He has to answer for something. I mean, he's the reason why. And there's going to be body cam. Make sure you guys are subscribed and have notifications turned on because now that the trial is over, I can release to you the unredacted body camera where the Grten Police Department, the Rotten Police Department, when they handed everybody the the news media and um other journalists the body camera footage, they redacted so much of it because it looks so bad for Brian Fehee and the Graten Police Department. But I have the unredacted uh videos and now that the trial is over, I can share those with you. So stay tuned to the channel. Those will be coming out. It's not going to be a repeat. This is new body camera footage you've never seen before. So, make sure it's going to be Fehee, Mrs. Fehee. Um the the cop saying that I think you handled it perfectly. I'm on your side. The cop literally tells Fee, I'm on your side. She catches herself and she says, "I'm on your point of view." But it was a complete conspiracy to violate my rights. And the reason I don't regret not having an attorney is because I did have attorneys advising me throughout this entire process and I appreciate them for that. But I wanted to do this. I I find the law fascinating. I knew that I wasn't going to be as good as a regular attorney. But what this case comes down to is what the judge is ultimately going to decide is is a private road dead end no turnaround sign. That's the state's case. You heard it. Private road dead end no turnaround. Is that a sign that revokes the license or privilege for someone to conduct a knock and talk per the Supreme Court case Florida v. Jardines? It's a matter of law. That's why I chose a bench trial instead of a jury trial because I knew that this was going to come down to a question of law. And I'm hoping that an attorney, a judge, when it comes to a question of law will do the right thing. Now, will a judge can a judge rule against me justice bite me just because he doesn't want me knocking on his door? or he thinks it sets a bad precedent. Whatever. Whatever. He hates the First Amendment. He hates journalism. He hates exposing bad cops. The the judge could do whatever he wants. But I wanted to leave it in the hands of a judge instead of a jury who could have been full of bootlickers in that county who could have just said, "Well, you shouldn't knock on somebody's door." Police will knock on our door whenever they damn well please. I don't care if you have a no trespassing sign. Do not enter. Keep out. It doesn't matter what signs you have. The police are knocking on your door if they want to talk to you. Okay, that's why I say never answer the door when the police knock. And maybe Brian Fe shouldn't have answered the door that day. But that's neither here nor there. The police can knock on your door. But the minute they can surveil you, they can use their flock cameras to surveil you. They can sit outside your house in their vehicle and surveil you. They will do whatever to intimidate, harass all in the false pursuit of justice, right? That's what they'll do. But at the end of the day, we can't knock on a law enforcement officer's door to ask him about his overtime. I wanted to see if he was going to be home at 3:30 in the afternoon. And guess what? He was. Even though he's getting all this overtime to pat his pension, he was home in his socks and his shorts watching TV during normal business hours. Did he even go to work that day? It was a work. It was a work week. Um, so that's the reason why I called Fehee because I He wasn't How are you not going to call Brian Fehee? How are you? How are you, States Attorney Fay? He prosecuting me on this case and not going to call him. It makes no sense whatsoever. So, let me look at some more comments here. And as the judge, I told you guys I was going to a non- sugarcoated version of the judge isn't supposed to be watching any of these videos, but you never know. He could be. But at the end of the day, I think the judge personally was very thoughtful. I think that he ruled against me a bunch of times because I I I'm not a lawyer. Um, but I think he took a I know he took a lot of notes. When I was testifying, I saw his notepad full of a bunch of notes. He took a lot of notes. He was very intent on listening. Um, you know, I wish he would have reigned in States Attorney Fehee in his little slide childish remarks, but he didn't say anything to me when I called him a child and told him, "You're not supposed to be talking right now, are you? Thanks." So, you know, I think I did a pretty good job for being non- attorney. I've spoken to at this point at least six attorneys um since this trial has concluded and they say I did a decent job. They say I did better than 50% of the attorneys that they know cuz you got to think about it, most attorneys don't even go to trial, right? Most attorneys are just making deals, plea agreements behind the scenes. Um there's trial attorneys and then there's deal making attorneys. Most attorneys are dealmakers. So could an attorney have done better job representing me? Of course. Of course I'm not an attorney. You never know. might go to law school. Never know. But I don't regret it. I wanted to show the judge. I wanted to show the people that I'm standing up for for our rights together, not just my rights. I could have taken a deal where no jail time, it goes off your record, whatever. Whatever. I could have taken a bunch of deals. They offered me a no jail time deal. Um, and now I'm facing up to 90 days in the Connecticut correctional facility system. and I would gladly make I'm not going to take a deal and I'm glad I didn't hire an attorney to be with me there. I did hire attorneys to help me along the way and I appreciate their insights. Um, and I did hire an attorney for my cameraman. I made sure I took care of him. He was my biggest concern. If I had to take a deal to make sure my cameraman didn't go to jail, I would have done it no matter what. My cameraman was a hero that day. He kept his mouth shut. He recorded everything perfectly. He didn't get scared and run away. He saved my life and I would have done anything, spent any amount of money to protect my cameraman and I'm glad that he's protected and um I'm glad that he came out and and testified and he he helped me out too by you know testifying to the truth. That's all he did was testify to the truth. So the judge is going to take has his as I said earlier in this video the judge is going to making his decision guilty or not guilty on September 3rd. It will be recorded. I will do a live stream after it and it I will post the video to my channel and I definitely have body camera footage. They have body camera and the body camera footage you guys are about to see that you never seen. Oh, and the Graten Police Department when Fehee was arrested for disorderly conduct because apparently threatening somebody with a firearm and spitting in their face is disorderly conduct. not breach of the peace, not threatening with a firearm, um not felony threatening, not menacing, none of those things. It's disorderly conduct. We all know that's Um we know he was protected and that's why I told him trial, you protected him because that's what he did. He protected Fee. He protected him. He's continuing to pro protect him by maliciously prosecuting me. He's trying to save him from a lawsuit. That's what he's trying to do here. Trying to hopefully get a sympathetic judge or whatever the case may be. But you know, the judge has one thing to decide. The judge is going to decide whether a private road dead end no turnaround sign revoke someone's inherent license or privilege to knock on a door based on Florida vart Jardines a Supreme Court case. I cited to the judge persuasive um arguments from the 10th circuit which state that not even a no trespassing sign is enough sufficient notice to revike to revoke the implied license. So, it's not binding on the court, but it is persuasive, and hopefully it persuades him to making the right decision and finding me not guilty. Um, that's all I can hope for. That's all I can hope for. I mean, it it is what it is. It's out of my hands at this point. It's in the judge's hands. Judge Guinari, 37 years old, one of the youngest judges I've ever been before. And I hope that he has not been jaded by the system. And I hope that he sees this for what it is. This was a malicious prosecution, a farce, and was meant to protect Feahhee. That's what this was meant to do. And when I upload the body camera footage that shows Fehee speaking to the cops, again, Graten Police Department didn't want you to see it. So, I'll probably title it the body camera footage they didn't want you to see. I want you to conduct a lie counter because he lied so many times to the cops. He refused to leave. We watched the video. I never refused to leave. He refused to leave. He refused to leave. He said, "I refused to leave two different times." Same thing with Lucilo, the Suffach County PBA president. I'll have a trial coming up in the next couple weeks for that. Um, a bench trial for the violation of trespass in New York State because he said I he swore on a written statement. I refuse to leave. We saw that video. That's why recording public servants is so important. It's very, very important. I want to say thank you to everybody who sent me um super chat. Let me see if I can pull them up here really quick. Thank you, Billy, of course, for your for your continued generosity. Okay, we're going to pull them up on the screen. Uh, big prayers for you. Thank you. I need them and your family. Thank you so much, Sunflower. I appreciate that. Thank you, Albby. Why are we watching this again? Oh, because it's epic. Yeah, it was epic. Some people just wanted a video with just the uh just the um just the closing. So, thank you, Billy. Of course. Thank you for the 10 gifted memberships. I appreciate your support. Thank you, Ali, for the gifted five memberships. Thank you. I appreciate your support. Thank you to all my members of the channel who subscribed to keep this channel going. Without you guys, without my supporters, none of this is possible. And guess what? We exposed for no matter what, guilty or not guilty, we exposed a tyrant like Brian Fehee, a thug with a badge, an animal, an unhinged savage to the world forever. His grandchildren will type in their grandfather's last name. His great grandchildren will type in their grandfather's last name and we'll see it. And by the way, remember he was arrested for disorderly conduct. The in the news reporting about it, the news said that there wasn't a mug shot taken. Oh yeah, there was a mug shot taken. And I'm going to I guess I can show it to you guys right now. Let's see if I have it on my phone here. There was a mug shot taken. Let's look at Brian Fee's mug shot. I couldn't share it with you because the ongoing trial. I don't think I have it on here, but there was a mug shot. Let's see if I can find it. There was a mug shot and I will show it to you when I upload the video. Um, let's see here. What was that last super chat? I missed it. Um, kind of want to find out if the FA's adult daughter is a You guys are going to be in trouble. It's like I don't care. It's It's freedom of speech. I don't care. I don't care. Um, thank you for fighting for our rights and we will never yield first amendment rights to these tyrants. Hope to see you in Ocala. Thank you so much. Appreciate all the super chats, guys. Oh, got another one. Um, why put private property signs out falling over if the two road signs meant private property, right? I mean, that's what the judge is going to be deciding here. I mean, it doesn't I don't understand it either. I'm right there with you guys. I don't understand it. But September 3rd, we will have the verdict and I will keep you updated. But from now till September 3rd, I will upload never before seen body camera which shows the conspiracy between the Graten Police Department and Fehee. He says, "Can you tow the billboard truck in the body camera footage?" And they're like, "No, it's legally parked." And he's like, "Can I pay for the tow?" And he's like, "Uh, no." Like, it's it's the you're not going to want to miss it. You see body camera footage of fee, click on it. Make sure you have notifications turned on. Constitutional freedom fighter, what's up, brother? I'll be there September 2nd to the 3rd. Okay, sounds good, brother. I'll see you there. Thank you. Anybody wants to show up on September 3rd for the decision, you're more than welcome to come. Danielson Superior Court. It's in the middle of nowhere, Connecticut. They put me there on purpose, but that's for another day. Um, Ed Wela, my daughter is on seventh grade and you have taught her so much. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. I appreciate her support. I've spoken at high schools before. I should have said that in my testimony. Not only have I trained police departments, district attorneys offices, ride alongs. I've also spoken at universities. You guys don't see that, but universities, um, high schools, government classes. I'm trying to spread positivity, try to educate the youth and all of us on our constitutional rights. And again, regardless of whatever animosity the prosecutor believes was there, animosity in itself, I, you know, whether whether it was a good idea to knock on his door or whether I had a right to knock on his door, an implied license to knock on the door are two different things. Um, you know, I'm sure my family would say that it wasn't a good idea because I could have been killed. But, you know, I see it as a good idea because I got to expose an unhinged animal. Hopefully I I I I wish he would have just answered the question and not try to kill me, but you know that's what happens. Hope this helps. Wish I could do more. It's good luck Sean. Thank you so much. It helps so much. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. Uh we got a call copua499. You can get your copu shirts on long island. I'll leave uh I'll tell my mods to put the link in the description. Uh Palooa 2026. Let's go. Oot TVO. Let's do it. Let's do it. Last the last order Palooa was great. So I appreciate you guys. I'm going to be getting out of here. Thank you for all the super chats. Thank you for all the love. Please take a second to hit the like button and share this video anywhere you can on social media. Make sure you subscribed and have notifications turned on so you don't miss any of the upcoming content I have. I have new audits, too. We're getting back to new audits. I'm actually in Illinois right now and um out here working, enjoying time, and um you know, back to work. There's more tyrants than Fehee. is more tyrants than Lucavilo, but I will be focusing on those two in the coming weeks and months and especially Lucavilo because he's in my hometown and I will not let a thug with a badge run my county. Not going to happen. So stay tuned for that. Love you guys as always. Stay safe. God bless. I'll see you in the next one. Long Island Audit. Peace.