1A Intelligence Desk

← Back to search results

Transcript Details

FRAUDITOR FAPA COMMITS SECOND CRIME AGAINST HIS VICTIM

What's up everybody? I hope you guys are doing fantastic. I just came back from a swim with the family, so that was a really good time. Now, I have three topics for you guys today and I'm going to put timestamps in the description, so that way you guys can skip around if you're not interested in all three. Hopefully, you are cuz I think they're all good. The first topic is going to be about Frapa committing another crime by doxing this individual. The second topic is about the lawsuit and the third topic is about an interview that Jay Tom Press did with Real News and trust me when I say that this interview is something else. You're going to want to watch that. So, why don't we get started with the lawsuit cuz it is the quickest update? So, it has to do also with that channel Really Cool News and I just want to say something that I know what he's doing. So, Really Cool News is just putting lies out there, then I dispel the lies and expose it, then he puts more lies and then the cycle continues and then he gets attention from it. So, I'm going to respond one last time and then that that will be it because what he did yesterday is he did a live stream and he said that oh, Fraudator Choice upset because we're reporting the news and we're reporting the facts and that couldn't be further from the truth. I have no problem with him reporting the news and the facts. When we were getting completely destroyed, when we had Vondruhn and there was bad news one after the other, I never said anything because he was reporting the facts, but now he's just fabricating facts and that's what I have a problem with. And I have proof that he's biased because he made a video on our motion to um our administrative motion that was 27 pages to have a hearing in person because we want a hearing in person to show evidence that DMA was being dishonest when he filed this lawsuit. He made some [ __ ] up about showing deleted videos. It was pure fabrication. We exposed that. Instead of apologizing, he just made up some more [ __ ] But now, guess what happened? So, our motion was granted. It says right here, "Plaintiff's administrative request for remote appearance is denied." So, we got exactly what we wanted. And you would think that he would make an update saying, "Hey, you know, okay. So, we're reporting the news. Here's the news. That motion was denied." Nope, not a peep. Because it doesn't align with the agenda. Because we got what we wanted. Our motion was successful. And you know what was really hilarious? Listen to this. In perhaps one of the most bizarre filings of the year, sensational Simon Lynn, writing on behalf of Jonathan So, he called it the most bizarre filing of the year, right? It's the most bizarre filing of the year, but it was successful and we got exactly what we wanted. So, yeah. Once again, I don't expect much from this channel. And I He's saying that like I'm trying to cancel him or something. I'm not trying to cancel him. I just want people to know that it's not a It's not an unbiased channel anymore. They're fabricating stuff out of thin air. And when they get called out, instead of saying, "Yeah, okay. Maybe we misread this. We didn't analyze this properly." They're just doubling down on stupid and lies. So, anyways, that's done. Let's move on to the next topic. We have um a post from Fapa, which is a doxing in uh threat. So, first of all, for those who haven't seen this incident, let's take a look at this vicious attack that Fapa did against this individual. So, you guys can see his hands are in his pocket. He previously got in his face, but he was not a threat. His hands were in his pocket. Let's take a look. I don't even do it, though. Get the [ __ ] of my face. Don't take another step at me. So, he walked away. He was looking over there. He walks away, and then Fousey being the coward [ __ ] that he is, pepper-sprayed him. And some people will say, "Hey, he photoshopped uh the guy's hand up in Fousey's face." And the reason that it's it's not exactly true is that his hand was up as he was trying to defend himself against the vicious attack from the pepper spray. You can see this. His hands are in his pocket, but then when he gets pepper-sprayed, that's when his hand goes up. So, it he was defending himself against the attack of the by the frauditor. So, let's This is something interesting because this guy could press charges for assault, and somehow Fousey thinks this is not enough. He hasn't done enough. So, he is threatening to dox him. Take a look at this. You remember this guy? He's an elementary school teacher. Not only is he an elementary school teacher, he's a special education teacher. There's a lot to uncover here. If this gets 3,000 likes, I will release all the information. So, now he's threatening to dox his name, his employer, and he's just threatening to dox him for no other purpose than uh social media engagement. And he got the 3,000 likes. So, here's the thing about this. This guy is a special education teacher. So, he deal he deals with kids that are special needs. And he saw Fousey, and he tried to help him. He tried to educate him. He probably saw his special needs students in Fousey, and he said, "Look, you know, I know you're not all there." But he tried to educate him a little bit, and Fousey just couldn't take it, and instead viciously assaulted him with pepper spray. Now, let me ask you guys a question. Do you think that this is a crime right there? This? Do you think that's a crime? I personally think so and let me just say that for some things AI is pretty helpful. I know not for everything, but AI can be helpful in a situation like this. I wouldn't use AI in court, but it is worth sometime asking AI a question. For example, AI has been able to help me fixing up my pianos when there's a software issues or Qbase. So, it can answer questions. Now, let me reiterate, I would not use it in court. It's not good for legal work or don't use it for anything that really matters, but for this circumstance, it is worth asking AI if this is a crime. So, this is what I said to to ChatGPT. I said, "A YouTuber pepper sprayed a man in Philadelphia during a confrontation. It was not self-defense and now the YouTuber is doxxing this individual's personal information such as name and employer to thousands of people online. Is this a crime? Short answer, yes. Both the pepper spraying and the doxxing you described can be crimes depending on the exact facts and intent. Let's break it down using the real Philadelphia type scenario you're referencing. So, obviously the pepper spraying we already know that's a crime because the guy's hands were in his pocket. He was walking away. We don't even need to address that. My real question was about the doxxing. So, doxxing, posting name, employer can also be a crime or civil liability. Doxxing is not auto always automatically illegal, but it often becomes illegal when certain factors are present. It may be criminal if it involves harassment or stalking, threats, witness intimidation, revenge or retaliation, publishing private information to cause harm. So, the charges could be harassment, stalking, intimidation, retaliation, and so on. So, it can also be a civil lawsuit. So, then ChatGPT goes on and on and on and on. So, what I asked is what is the statute for the doxing in Philadelphia? And chat GPT said there is no single statute in Philadelphia or Pennsylvania called doxing. Instead, prosecutors use several existing criminal statutes depending on the behavior and intent. Here are the actual statutes most commonly used. So, the primary statute used for doxing is harassment and that is 18 PA 2709 harassment key legal language a person commits harassment when with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another they engage in a course of conduct or repeatedly commit acts that serve no legitimate purpose. So, why this applies to doxing? Posting someone's personal information, name, employer, address to thousands of people it can cause harm or retaliation and it qualifies as a course of conduct with intent to harass or alarm and it serves no legitimate purpose. So, let me ask you guys, what legitimate purpose does this serve? To dox this guy's name, his employer's information, uh what does that serve? Absolutely nothing. The only thing this does is that it harasses this guy, it annoys, it alarms him. And it has no purpose. So, I personally think that it qualifies obviously if Fapa were to be charged, it would it would be a lawyer not chat GPT looking at it, but for the purpose of this video, I think this was a pretty good exercise and um yeah. So, the thing though is that if he doxes this guy's information and his phone number, it's going to be a lot easier for people to inform him first of all of the aggressor's name, Johnny Medaglia III, obviously Fapa, because right now he doesn't know who his aggressor was because he left and Fapa never identifies either way. So, it would be easy to tell him first of all his aggressor's name and second of all inform him of his rights regarding doxing and pressing criminal charges and so on. And that's if he wants to. He might not want to get involved in all that, but at the same time this guy is just poking the bear. Like Fapa is just he already committed a crime against him and now he's trying to go even further and he's trying to dox him and commit another crime. So, and that's the thing that happens with the pepper spray frauditors is when they're really trigger happy with the pepper spray, just like what happened with Riverside. Uh they get confident. They get really confident that nothing can happen to them and that they're always going to be able to pepper spray people and just walk away with no charges. And then eventually that changes. Just like Riverside did over a year in jail when he was facing like 20. Like something like this could happen to Fapa. So, we took care of that. That was the statute of harassment. I just double-checked just to make sure Chad GPT wasn't feeding me [ __ ] But yeah, for the purpose of the video I think it's pretty useful. So, we took care of the lawsuit. We talked about that. Now we are going to talk about J Town Press. So, for those who haven't seen this vicious attack, let's take a look because this is what is being referred to in this interview. Yeah, and the reason why he he dragged J Town out is because this was a patient over there. So, he was very cool with J Town Press this entire time explaining to Lana that, you know, you can't do this. You got to leave. But then when a customer a client came in and was trying to put, you know, I don't know if you guys have health card numbers or whatever you guys have in the states. Was trying to put their information. That's where he drew the line in, and that's why he he did what he did. Don't touch me. Don't touch me. Get off of me. Get off of me. Get off of me. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? GET OFF OF ME. GET OFF OF ME. GET OFF OF ME. ALL RIGHT. SO, that was a vicious attack. Now, let's take a look at the interview. I'm going to blast this at the highest cuz I want to make sure Oh, my volume was low. That's why the previous clips I'm going to edit and post, but let let's take a look. Well, I'm curious, you know, how did you Can you say you're from Jacksonville? How did you end up in Macon? Was that like a viewer tip? Was this just >> That That's correct. I get a lot of uh I I didn't mean to interrupt you, but I get a lot of different uh uh tips and leads, and I do my own research. Uh I believe I forget exactly, but I believe that particular So, I'm going to be talking a lot in this video because there's just so much [ __ ] It's It's almost impressive. So, tips and leads, that's [ __ ] What frauditors do is they'll just go anywhere. They'll go anywhere. It doesn't matter what building, they'll just go there, and they'll just do their thing. They'll just harass the people there. Now, if they want to justify themselves, sure, they can put reviews like this, but we're going to take a look at these reviews and see what >> The health department had a very low um star rating. A lot of times when I go into these places uh to do my investigations, uh I get people that you waiting to have their THC card renewed, and they said they couldn't do that. Uh They They had to get it through the doctor. >> As I'm standing there quietly recording, not saying anything to anybody, uh I'll have people come So, this is a four-star review, so that's not exactly um that's not exactly helping your case. >> come up to me and say, "Hey, um you know, I was here, you know, looking for a dentist, blah, blah, one star." Um, so, if you need to get a dentist, don't bother there because they won't help you. Uh, you know, the thing with people that leave [ __ ] reviews is that a lot of them are brain-dead. Now, my wife had a e-commerce business, and I'm not going to say exactly what she was selling, but she was selling stuff, and one customer was like, "Wow, I love this so much. It's so good. I love it." One star. It's like, the [ __ ] are you smoking? Like, some people that leave reviews don't even process, or I don't even know if if they're maybe eating too many crayons or something like that. It's like, some people are really brain-dead. And so, you can't really trust reviews that much. And now, especially when you're dealing with a health facility, a lot of people that are going to leave reviews are going to be drug addicts. They're looking for, you know, couple Vicodin or cut or like the other person, the THC cards. So, you have to take this with a grain of salt. Now, this is a good pretense, or pretext, sorry, for frauditors to just go harass. They'll say, "Oh, look, there was all these [ __ ] reviews." But, you can find that anywhere. whatever last week or, you know, or or a month ago or whatever. And this is the experience that I had. >> me down. Yeah, so, you you wanted some pills and they turned you down. Like, come on, man. Like, how how are you putting this as this this would be uh, uh, uh, the how it helps your case. It's so brain-dead. at this particular location. So, I'm able to put their story, uh, you know, out so people can see how the, uh, you know, how this particular government center or this government agency is treating people, we the people. And I'm curious to know, you call yourself a a a auditor, First Amendment auditor, you know, they there's there's like a there's a mixed reaction online to them, right? Some people think they're doing a good job, some people think well they're just trying to get a reaction out of people. What does that mean to you being a First Amendment auditor? You kind of mentioned it there in the last question but I wanted to go a little bit deeper. So this is where the journalist is kind of doing an okay job because he's saying yeah, some people are saying that they're doing an important job and other people are saying that you're just trying to get a reaction out of people aka rage baiting which is exactly what frauditing is. I mean you know Fappa is ultimate rage baiter because he's not targeting the government. Now Lana has a little inch more credibility because she is at least rage baiting the government. The people that target the private citizens have no credibility whatsoever. Let's see Lana's answer. >> Lana tell me what that means to you. I think it's more of just a term that people use in this niche that we're in that I'm in on YouTube but I consider myself more of what they call free press and you'll hear that throughout my my videos. The way our republic was designed here in America, our founding fathers set it up for citizens for the people we the people to be involved in the government. So a lot of things on my channel is I'm teaching people how to be involved because a lot of people sit there and say you know you know I've got kids, I've got a job, I've got this and that and I can't make it to these meetings or you know to be involved with government. That's actually how they have So this is textbook gaslighting. Frauditing has nothing to do with going to public meetings because I encourage people to go to public meetings and to voice their opinion and be involved with their community. That is how you're supposed to interact with your government and how you're supposed to participate. That's not what frauditers do. Frauditors go and create situations and confrontations for millions of views and dollars, and it has nothing to do with trying to change things for their community because they don't even go in their own community. They're They go sometimes multiple states away, sometimes like with Auditing America, goes all the way to Guam to start [ __ ] over there. So, yeah, textbook gaslighting. I don't know why she's referring to public meetings when what she does is frauditing. It makes no sense. set up uh our republic. They've set it up for citizens I'm going to speed it up a bit just so cuz there's it's it's not She's talking kind of slowly. to be involved. I believe it was Thomas Jefferson actually said it's it's our duty to be involved in our government. When you don't show up to these meetings, you're kind of showing these elected officials that you don't care. So, to me, it's like get involved. I say it a lot of times on my channel as well, power corrupts. It's It's actually what happens. People's egos get get get involved in in this power just gets to their head. Just like they taught you, I don't know That is such a good point. Power corrupts. And I do agree that there are corrupted individuals in the government. Just recently, there was a judge that was power tripping. He was yelling at an IT guy like the guy was an ant, like the guy was trash. Meanwhile, the IT guy was there trying to help him. So, yeah, that judge got humiliated and hopefully fired. So, yeah, power does corrupt, and I can flip that right back on you. Power corrupts when it comes to frauditors. Fapa just got 100,000 subscribers recently, and now he feels comfortable pepper spraying people that have their hands in their pocket, and then he feels coms- comfortable doxing that same individual. Long Island Audit feels comfortable showing up to an officer's house that he has previous beef with. You know, that's what I'm saying. Power corrupts. This little bit of power that they got is getting to their head and they're becoming more reckless and more corrupted. So, I agree with Lana over here on that. They teach it now, but back when I was going through school, they taught you civics classes. I always say, you know, they teach you about the three branches of government, which they do their checks and balances. We are the fourth we the people are the fourth branch of government and we need to do our own checks and balances. That's the whole reason like they're in the state of Georgia, for example, they have the Georgia open meetings act. They have the public records the open records act. That way you as a citizen can be involved in our government in this process in this experiment as they say here in America. I always educate people on what they can do. I mean that's pretty much what in a nutshell. I mean you know, you got to get involved. You got to educate your kids. So, the thing is if Lana's good at gaslighting. I'll I'll give Lana that much credit. It's pretty good gaslighting. Like for someone that's uneducated as to what's going on over here with Lana, this this is decent gaslighting. But if you compare it to the fact that Lana is the one that invented the strategy of peeping in the window, Lana and Creepy David where they go up to the window and sometimes they hold a tripod up and they just creep out the employees through the blinds, you can see that this is complete nonsense. That the purpose is harassment, at least in my opinion. I mean me as a citizen, I'm going to get involved. I'm not a trained, you know, journalist like yourself. I never went to school for it, but freedom I'm glad you're admitting that because you are not a trained journalist. You're not a journalist. You are a rage baiter and you know, not the best one at that because it's so obvious what you're doing. of press is our right to go in and check on government. And when they and the analogy that I always use is I know everybody's always heard about the second amendment. So, the second amendment everybody sits there and says, well, it's for you know, for defending yourself or it's uh to go out and and hunt a deer. Uh no, actually what our founding fathers set up the second amendment is specifically so you can take back our republic from a tyrannical government. So, freedom of speech is the same thing. Uh you know, it's so you can speak ill against our government without any recourse. Freedom of press is so not for people like yourself to do news reports on these random things, but it's so we can specifically point a camera or report in that case cuz before the camera was invented, right? So, it's it's to sit there and actually write reports and stories and in this day and age to point that camera at the at our government. So, you saw the jump from write reports and stories, and then it skipped to in this day and age point a camera at the government. Like, what are you talking about? What are you talking about? You were making sense. There are journalists that are writing reports and stories, and now you jump to sticking a camera in someone's face. Like, there's a massive disconnect between the two. And show we the people what's going on. Cuz I know you see a lot of these uh police videos where citizens are just picking up their camera and report and that reporting. And and I know I don't want to pick on cops, but uh they're kind of the low-hanging fruit, so to speak it because, you know, it happens so often cuz we interact with police so much. But, you see a lot of these citizens picking up a camera and recording uh police interactions. And we're finding a lot of negative police interactions, and we're able to take care of those police uh in a legal sense, in a peaceful sense. You know, if they do something wrong, I guess the better word was we're able to hold them accountable. This man who attacked me, I mean, he he just snapped. I'm not sure why he did what he did. I was peaceful >> There's a very clear reason why he did what he did. He did not just snap. He did that because you were recording people's information. You were creeping out everybody. You had no legitimate purpose there. He asked you multiple times to leave, and then there was a patient that came in and was typing her personal information, and he didn't want you to capture it capture it on your footage. So, that's why he did what he did. He did not just snap. That did not happen. recording inside of a of the of the public lobby. >> As far as you know, you've everywhere, right? Airports, I I office, you know. You saw that cut? There's a lot of edits here, and I wonder if what happened is that the journalist educated her and was like, "Well, he didn't just snap. He did this for X and Y reason." And then Lana was like, "You know what? Let's take that out of the video. Let's just take it out of the video because cameras don't lie, but editing sure does." There was multiple cuts that I've seen here. If you're going to have an interview with real news, why don't you just give us the raw file? Give us the entire interview uncut so we can see how you performed from the very first second to the last second. Why do you feel the need to remove parts of the interview while you had your chance to say something and then the journalist was cut off? So disingenuous. You've been arrested with so many other people. How does this incident rank among the ones that you've had to deal with? I I I would definitely say this ranks on the highest as far as getting physical. This particular occasion, uh the police did It's not the highest. Lana was ragdolled by um an an officer like last year, and then she I think she was found guilty for that. Lana's been tossed around left and right, so this is nothing. This is just another Tuesday. Absolutely nothing. You know, if the roles were reversed, if I would have attacked somebody uh like a government official, that security guard, or in this case, that doctor or director, uh whatever title you want to use, I guarantee you, in my opinion, I would have been sitting in the back of a of a police vehicle. So, has an incident report officially been filed yet with the sheriff's office on your behalf? Or how does that work? Because we've asked them um and I'm not sure cuz you mentioned in your livestream and in the video you were planning to press charges, file a report, something like that. Where does that stand right now? So So, they um well, that's what I was saying. I I gave them my information, and I told him obviously I record everything. I told the deputy that was there that I'd like to press charges. Um but as far as I'm aware, I Uh, there's no charges pending that I'm aware of. You talked about this to go back to what you said a few minutes ago about telling a story. Another code. All right, you know, you documented what you saw in there. If you were going to paint a narrative about what you saw at the Department of Public Health and and talking about your way to, you know, hold people accountable, things like that. What what would be the way that you would tell that story? Uh, what did you see in there that really stood out to you? Obviously, we saw it in the the video, but, you know, what was something that you feel like people should know about what's going on here making a dime? Um, I would have to say other than the actual attack, uh, before the attack, um, I just noticed a lot of, uh, cuz I was there for a little bit. I wasn't Yeah, it wasn't like a 10-minute video, um, but the the one thing that Yeah. They stay there for a very, very long time. I believe I forgot who it was, but there was someone that said, and it was on body cam, so it wasn't edited out of a video, and he said that guy was there for 4 hours. So, they're there for 4 hours trying to rage bait people into a confrontation. And then, you might not get rage baited after 10 minutes or after 30 minutes, but maybe after 4 hours of seeing this creep in front of your business, creeping out the customers, recording everybody going in and out, maybe you will have a reaction. So, I'm glad that Lana's confirming that this was not a 10-minute interaction. Sometimes, they're there for hours and hours. kept hitting on homeless. There was a lot of government employees sitting around doing absolutely nothing. So, that was my one big like resounding, um, item that I saw while walking through, uh, which is a which is the case in a lot of ways. Uh, you walk around these government offices, and they're just these big palatial palaces with with almost nobody in them. You I mean, you have a couple of random government employees walking around. In this particular case, it's the same thing at the Department of Health. Why are we the people Why are we paying all this tax money for nobody to be going in there and getting service? Maybe maybe we can downsize. But, do we actually need a bigger facility? That's my That's my one resounding That's not a bad point. That is not a bad point. If you're seeing something that is under utilized, then you should rearrange your resources. For example, downsize the health department that doesn't have that many customers and upgrade the DMV that has massive lines. So, that's not a bad point. But, once again, you don't need to go in there and act like a total piece of [ __ ] to accomplish that. You can go in there respectfully, observe, not record patients, and just act like a decent human being, and come up with the exact same conclusion. So, ridiculous. Question. My whole thing is you know I'm I'm more of a libertarian-minded as far as less government and the individual needs to govern themselves. So, governance actually starts with the individual first. Yeah, I would rather have smaller government, less government services, and less government facilities, and throw all that back to the private sector. 100 years ago, I mean if you if you if you look back, I mean we didn't have all this stuff 100 years ago and we were fine. You know, churches picked up the you know for for for charity and whatnot. So, if you think about the social welfare programs, you know, our families took care of everybody. Now, it seems like to me that It looks like there was a cut there, but it was still Lana talking. So, I'm assuming that Lana was rambling and rambling and rambling and realized it didn't make sense in post and then just cut it out. the people are relying too much on our government. You know, are you planning to come back to me now? Are you getting more tips about this area? You know what Dude, come on with the tips. There was no tips. There was no tips in the first place. And the thing is like the journalist is saying, "Oh, well, are you coming back in this area?" Like there's something special about his area. There's nothing special about Macon or anywhere else. Frauditors, they go, they create havoc, and they leave. And sometimes they have to come back for court, but most of the time they just leave. So, yeah, it's ridiculous. What are you really hoping to, you know, people to take away? You talked about it again in the beginning. You want people to be involved, things like that. But, you know, what else did you learn from your your short time here in Macon just about government agencies and stuff like that? Right now, I actually don't have any tips right now to come back to another agency per se. I just >> a very big mistake that this fake journalist did over here. Why is your window open? You're You're getting all the noise from outside while you're trying to do this serious interview with your car in your car. Like, why don't you roll up the window? Anyways, I guess I'm nitpicking. This is the least of the problems here, but I just thought that a journalist would, you know, maybe be in an office or maybe at home somewhere quiet where you can do a professional interview. If Lana's on the road, maybe go to a hotel room or something. So, it's just kind of ghetto. That's all I'm going to say. It's pretty ghetto. But, like I said, I get tips all the time. So, there's no telling what people are going to report, especially after they see something like this. Yeah, and then, you know, how are you feeling after this incident, right? Because you mentioned it, you're you're very shaken up. You know, it was something that you weren't expecting to to happen in the video. It just seemed like your reaction was was very visceral. The whole time you were just I was in shock. I was in complete shock. And to uh So, this is where I think the journalist is not doing a very good job with grilling Lana. If you're trying to be impartial and you're trying to be a real journalist, why not do a little bit of research ahead of time and say, "Well, whatever you want to call Lana, say Lana or Mrs. Patrick, we realize that you have several lawsuits that are complete failure and you're actually facing some penalties, like $5,000 of fees of attorney fees in one case, and your lawsuits are just getting tossed out left Like, what's going on here? Are you a real activist or are you trying to like get some go away money? Are you a grifter? Or what's going on with all these lawsuits? This would be a perfect opportunity to ask those questions." But, the journalist is failing to do so. Um I can't tolerate much more of this, and I think my recording's going on for 31 minutes, and I want to make sure this video is under like 30, 35. So, I think we're going to wrap it up soon. Let's see if we can get one more coherent sentence out of her. I don't know what's going to happen, but let's see. The video doesn't do it well, but um but this man was a good two and a half times or or bigger than me. He was a big man. Um so, once he grabbed a hold of me, I was just I mean, I was kind of just pretty much along for the ride, so to speak, cuz uh he kind of lifted me up, and I didn't really have a whole lot of control. So, uh just the look on his face, I mean, just the blank stare on his face, I mean, like I said, he just snapped. I mean, that's that's the best way I can describe it. Uh if we were in the post office, I'd say he was going he was going postal, but I I have Haha, so funny. All right, um I've seen enough of this. I've seen enough of this. This is uh garbage. The Frauditor is gaslighting the real journalist, and the real journalist isn't uh isn't asking the right questions, didn't do enough research, and um it's pretty lousy. Uh journalism as a whole, like gaming journalism, is down the toilet. It's just dead. It's complete garbage. It's all clickbait articles left and right. There's like nobody that does good journalism anymore in the gaming sphere, except like one or two. And in general, like journalism has really gone downhill. Even real journalism. Obviously, I'm not talking about Frauditor. So, yeah, I'm kind of disappointed in this guy, but it is what it is. I wasn't expecting that much more. Now, that's it for the video. Thank you so much for watching. By the way, we are going to get to 100,000 subscribers. I started cross-promoting this channel a little bit across my other channels. Trying to get some more people on here to support the movement. So, if you're new around here, or if you've been watching for a while, and you just haven't subscribed yet, make sure to subscribe. It's going to help the channel. It's going to help the movement. Thank you so much, and I'll see you guys on the next one.