1A Intelligence Desk

← Back to search results

Transcript Details

FRAUDITOR GETS DESTROYED BY FEDERAL JUDGE

What's up, everybody? I hope you guys are doing fantastic. If you're not, trust me, you will be doing a lot better after this video. This is one of the most hilarious thing I have seen in a long time. Rogue Nation filed a lawsuit, and he got absolutely demolished by the judge, but it's not in the way you think. Now, without further ado, let's get started. All right, the procedural history. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint against defendant pursuant to 1983 on December 14th, 2023, alleging violations of his first, fourth, and fifth amendment rights. A United States Magistrate Judge conducted an initial review of plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the informa pauperis statute, which authorizes courts to dismiss a case if the action fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, is frivolous or malicious, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. The Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation on April 12th, 2024, recommending that the District Court dismiss this action with prejudice without leave to amend. The District Court concluded that plaintiff had failed to state a plausible claim for relief as to his fifth amendment claims, but alleged sufficient facts to survive initial review as to the first and fourth amendment claims. So, for some odd reason, the defendant in this case did not fight the case. And this is something that I did not want to do in my lawsuits because if you just let the plaintiff win by default, you don't have a say in anything, and the judge can award whatever they feel is fit. But, in this case, Rogue Nation asked the judge for $200,000, and this is what the judge had to say. All right, so plaintiff seeks punitive damages, $200,000. Plaintiff asserts that this was willful and knowing violation of my rights, and I had the law in my hand, and he refused to read or understand it. When asked to provide statute numbers of the laws he was claiming applied, he refused to do so. Plaintiff submitted a flash drive with his complaint, which contains a video of the incident in question. At the hearing, plaintiff argued that the violations of his constitutional rights supported an award of nominal and punitive damages. Plaintiff also submitted a declaration regarding his damages, which states in relevant part as follows: I suffered emotional distress, fear, and anxiety as a result of defendant's conduct. Although I suffered no physical injury, defendant's conduct placed me in fear of immediate unlawful arrest. Defendant's action were willful, malicious, and in reckless disregard of my constitutional rights. The threats to arrest me for not stopping the recording and for not providing ID demonstrate intentional and retaliatory misconduct. Based on defendant's intentional violations of my constitutional rights, I believe that punitive damages in the amount of $200,000 as demanded in my complaint are necessary to punish the misconduct and deter similar behavior in the future. And I make this declaration to provide evidentiary support under Rule 55 B2 for the court's determination of damages, including punitive damages. All right, so I'm not going to read the entire response, but trust me, the entire punch of the joke is about to drop, and just be warned, you might fall off your chair laughing. In his motion, plaintiff requested that the court enter default judgments against defendant and award plaintiff damages for the amount requested. As noted, plaintiff's complaint seeks punitive damages, $200,000. This sentence appears to solely request $200,000 in punitive damages. However, a litigant may not obtain an award of punitive damages in the absence of an award of compensatory or nominal damages. Given plaintiff's request for nominal and emotional distress damages at the hearing and liberally construing his pro se complaint, the undersigned declines to recommend that plaintiff be awarded no damages because he failed to explicitly plead compensatory, nominal, or emotional distress damages. Emotional distress damages are not presumed from every denial of a federal right, but must be proven by competent, sufficient evidence. The plaintiff must adduce sufficient evidence that such distress did in fact occur, and that its cause was the constitutional deprivation itself, and cannot be attributable to other causes. Conclusion and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that the District Court grants plaintiff's motion for default judgment and award nominal damages in the amount of $1. [Laughter] AND I DO WANT TO remind you guys that federal lawsuit costs $405. So, the judge is recommending that he gets a single dollar out of this ridiculous lawsuit. Now, I don't understand why they didn't fight it. I have no clue, but at that point, if all they have to pay is a dollar, then that makes a lot of sense. Now, obviously, Georgie boy was not happy about this whatsoever. He threw a little tantrum, and he posted this video. Now, I do want to show you a couple parts of it that are very relevant, and the first part made me laugh out loud. Take a look at this. So, as soon as I saw this thumbnail appear on my YouTube feed, I knew exactly that it was coming from Rogue Nation because there is no one that operates in such a ghetto fashion. This guy has so much disdain for his viewers that he refuses to click the little minus button that would remove his screen capturing software from the screen. This guy is so lazy that he can't even click one button before starting to yap like a And then on top of that, you have to listen to his labored breathing. Um net. So, this was the heavy breathing and lip smacking just from the first minute. Like, this is really ridiculous. How do you possibly expect to gain subscribers when you treat them like that? You don't even have the respect to get a proper mic or to, I don't know, take a breath before you start talking. This guy's completely out of breath sitting down recording a video. You are not too far behind, Georgie a transparency buddy. If I were you, I would stop eating the entire carton of cigarette and look after your health a little bit more because this is ridiculous. Now, the part that's really important to me, that I find absolutely hilarious, is this. A plaintiff's emotional distress may be corroborated by demeanor, contemporaneous statements. So, I found this really funny because Rogue Nation is always criticizing my English, and granted, my English is not perfect. I probably screwed up a couple words or pronunciation when I was reading the judge's decision. But, this on the other hand is hilarious because keep in mind, he wrote this. He actually wrote this, and he doesn't understand that this word is contemporaneous, not contemporous. These are the words that he wrote himself, allegedly, and this is what brings me to AI. Obviously, he had AI help him to write this motion because he doesn't even understand contemporaneous. He has never heard of this word before, doesn't know how to read it or pronounce it. Now, is this 100% proof that he used ChatGPT? No, not necessarily, but I've seen this word before, and it's not a word that you usually use in a conversation, but it looks like it's a word that ChatGPT loves to use in motions. And the place where I saw it was in a motion, and I strongly believe that that motion was written with the help of ChatGPT, much like this one. So, I find it really funny that he's criticizing my English, but then he's using words that he himself doesn't understand. >> It's literally, I think, one of the best cases to show reckless indifference, um and emotional distress. If And I told this to the Magistrate Judge when I went to court there in South Carolina that I had just recently, um been arrested unlawfully in Georgia for felony that, um was just, you know, crazy. And, um his, uh, you know, continued threats of arrest constituted emotional distress to me cuz, you know, I don't like being arrested. I don't like having my freedom taken, and, um you know, that sort of things. For someone who doesn't like getting arrested, you sure are committing a lot of crimes. And as we're talking about committing crimes, looks like Rogue Nation needs a little bit of help so he can get back in the streets and commit more crimes. And he is asking you for $6,000. >> Again, folks, don't forget, I got the Gibson Go here. Um So, if you can, a link will be in the description. Please think about donating, um to get me back on the road. It's a $6,000 goal. I've raised $40. So, and that was a few months ago cuz I hadn't really been promoting it because I needed to be on probation when I filed my habeas corpus. So, you have to be in custody for the habeas corpus. Now, once the habeas corpus is filed, I can then get off probation while that case is proceeding, but I I did have to be on probation before I could file the habeas. I'm proud to announce, guys, that since he posted his video, he actually got another donation, and now he's sitting at $75 out of 6,000. And that's why I find it so funny when there's these lens liquors that compare my GoFundMe to his GoFundMe or other criminals GoFundMe and say, "I didn't commit any crimes. I was doing fair use reaction videos, and then some scumbag decided to sue me, and now I need to defend myself." And obviously, I'm putting my money in it as well. I'm not expecting you guys to pay for all of it or even most of it. The fact that people don't understand the difference between the two is mind-blowing. This guy is a criminal that went out there, committed a crime, was found guilty, was given a fine, and now he doesn't even want to pay the fine himself. He's expecting his viewers to pay the fine so he can go harass more people and commit more crimes. Make it make sense. Anyways, that's it for the video. He might win his lawsuit, but he might only get a buck. Thank you so much for watching. Don't forget to subscribe, and I'll see you guys on the next one.